Friday, 4 December 2020

Some sightings of the Monster from locals

 


I was alerted by Michael Alberty that there were some stories of the Loch Ness Monster by residents of the loch published in a local newsletter back in 2004. This was the Boleskine Bulletin which ran from 1997 to 2014. A letter was published in the Spring issue requesting any readers to write in with their own sightings of the monster. A few brave souls were prepared to put their heads above the parapets. The first letter ran the request and note the writer adds the postscript that they may have seen the beast themselves from the Foyers Hotel.

The Loch Ness Monster seems to make a tantalising appearance on occasion. By all accounts quite a few people in the area have seen it. These sightings would make an interesting article for the next BB. Please contact Buddy MacDougall, Coach House, Foyers, Tel. 01456 486366. P.S. My late husband, Stewart and I were sure we saw something (through binoculars) back in the 70's from Foyers Hotel.

The next issue details a clutch of reports numbering five in all:

Following my letter in the last B.B. asking for sightings of the Loch Ness Monster, there has been some response. The objects vary considerably. Our sighting was from the Foyers Hotel and could be seen out in the middle of the loch. We watched with two hotel guests and passing binoculars around we saw a strange object the size and shape of an upturned cabin cruiser. It was a dark grey shiny colour and you could see little waves lapping against it. It submerged for a few minutes and then came up again for a time before submerging again and disappearing completely.

A friend from Inverness, Elma Kay, saw, along with a group of friends, a long neck topped by a small head emerging from the loch at Dores Bay. 

Buddy MacDougall

 

Travelling from Ardachy back into Fort Augustus, at Borlum Bay, I spotted what appeared to be a black long neck of some creature about 4 to 5 feet out of the water which at the time was flat calm. I stopped the car and it remained in view for several seconds; it then went down leaving behind ripples on the surface.

Gordon McDonald

 

Within a few days of the above sighting, Ana and I were in the car at Borlum Bay and clearly saw a shiny black semi-circular hump probably about a quarter of a mile to the North. By transit observation on the far shore, we established that this hump was moving in a north-easterly direction. At this distance it is difficult to estimate size but would think that the hump had a length of about 5 feet and stood some 3 feet out of the water. We can only conclude that what we saw was some form of sinuous creature.

Ana & Peter Arrowsmith

 

In the early 1980's, I was with a friend having a picnic by the ferry pier at Foyers when I saw three distinct shiny black humps followed about six feet behind by two further similar humps moving through the water towards Dores and about 30 feet from the shoreline. Shortly afterwards, the humps submerged at which point I turned to my friend enquiring if she had seen what I saw - she confirmed that she had. I wondered at the time if I had witnessed Mother Nessie being followed by her offspring.

Muriel Lees, Inverness

 

Finally, the Autumn issue had another three sightings, including one from the pre-Nessie era of 1916:

I write this in reply to your request for Monster sightings - with some reluctance for I have only discussed these matters with my family and close friends. My father, whilst on leave from the Lovat Scouts in 1916 had a sighting near Urquhart Castle.

Then 30 odd years ago, en route to Inverness, my sister, nephew and I saw a black shape with a long neck and head with a considerable wash behind it in Urquhart Bay. But when we reached a lay-by, we could see nothing.

Then on a sunny morning in July 1979 when the loch was flat calm, I was rowing on the other side with my husband. When we were in mid loch, I suddenly saw what appeared to be an upturned boat just beyond Foyers Point. I handed the binoculars to my husband who said he was looking at a black shape like an upturned canoe and handed the glasses back to me. Shortly after the object submerged and we both agreed we had not been looking at a freak wave but the back of a living creature. And so we agreed with the late Sir Peter Scott and the naturalist Gerald Durrell that there may be a small breeding herd of these creatures which has survived for centuries in the loch.

Kay McGee, 36 Scarba Drive, Glasgow

 

This small number of accounts is doubtless the tip of the iceberg of encounters that will go unreported and never go beyond the family or perhaps even the eyewitness themselves. I suspect there are overall more unreported accounts than those reported to the media and other publications. 

As far as I can tell, these eight accounts do not appear on the database I use and can be classified as single hump (3), long neck (2), multi-humps (1),  back plus neck (1) and unclassified (1). Two sightings involved binoculars.

Of course, some locals will go their entire lives by the loch never seeing anything unusual which makes me wonder what proportion of the population have seen the beast? I would guess the proportion has been going down over the decades as people live more hurried lives and spend less time looking at the loch, but I am speculating.

Copies of the newsletter can be viewed here.



The author can be contacted at lochnesskelpie@gmail.com




27 comments:

  1. Just curious, how many times do people report the upturned boat nessie, as that seems to be another creature from the one with long neck getting reporting!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hope you're not suggesting we have more than one unknown creature in the Loch...that would be truly mad.

      Delete
    2. No reason to think this unless you have a biological reason why the neck cannot be held underwater while the back is exposed.

      Delete
  2. Another interesting article and always good to get the local encounters...as you say I suspect there are many more which never went beyond family. Certainly that was my impression from my visit last year.
    What I find interesting here is the clear recollections of a neck and small head....it seems to me overall that these type of sightings are in the minority. Again its interesting that the creature seems more likely to make an appearance when the loch is flat calm.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Two necks out of 8 sightings is higher than the historical average (as documented by Mackal). Neck plus hump visible at the same time, and moving at speed as well, is so extremely rare it's a true outlier among the data. I suspect any of that last sort are misidentified boats, but then that's an unlikely mistake for a local to make! Ethnographic evidence such as these reports is much more likely to be reliable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Steve, long time no hear from you on this blog and it's a rarity when we do. I am curious, do you still strongly hold to the Giant Salamander hypothesis as your explanation to the LNM? By strongly, I mean with a certitude of maybe 90% to 99.99% I see your blog is still up, so I assume you haven't given up on that line of thinking. By your reasoning, the strange creature reported by Alfred Cruickshank could have been a giant salamander? Any further musings you can offer on here to fortify your giant salamander belief? A lot of upturned boats floating at speed under their own power around Loch Nesss. LOL

      Delete
    2. in the ocean near catiluna island are many large sea creatures..
      Can't the same be possible in the loch?
      rember the "water bull"( giant salamander)
      water horse ( plesiosaur type)
      kelpie ( strange unknown animal.)

      Delete
    3. In a 26 square mile loch? I doubt it very much.

      Delete
    4. Reading your blog today, Steve, and realising I missed out loads of it years ago! Great stuff, and I think you might be onto something, actually. :-)

      Delete
    5. SP's theory that it's the giant salamander's tail poking in the air that's being mistaken for a head and neck, is brilliant.

      Delete
    6. C'mon john, catiluna? That's a character in World of Warcraft video game! (Had to look that one up) Are you for real? Did you mean Catalina Island off the coast of Los Angeles Ca. USA? The only large sea creatures in the ocean there are whales and great white sharks. LOL

      Delete
    7. there are no restrictions on large different species in vibrant cold water systems.
      it is ridiculous to say only one type would be there.
      as far as i know john you havent done a census of marine biology in the waters off catiluna island.
      there are more very large animals in those waters.

      Delete
    8. The only concession I would make to multiple large species in the loch is the occassional presence of seals. Loch Ness is hardly a vibrant cold water system.

      Delete
    9. Still think that could be a combo of creatures, as think that few extremely large eels, some large amphibians, seals, and other sea animals going in and out could account for nessie!

      Delete
  4. Interesting YouTube History channel documentary on the origin and formation of Loch Ness "Mysteries of Loch Ness Uncovered"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZVT1yeR79w

    ReplyDelete
  5. To be fair though there is a fair few sightings of a neck and a hump together.

    ReplyDelete
  6. OT New whale species just discovered that demonstrates unknown large animals are still out there...
    https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/09/americas/new-whale-species-mexico-scli-intl-scn/index.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. Fantastic Olrik. Maybe there is a new species of catfish waiting 2 be discovered pmpl

    ReplyDelete
  8. Cheers Mr Olrik.. Strengthens my case FOR our Ness creatures to be an unknown or new type of creature to science or an evolved one! None of the usual suspects ie sturgeons catfish or eels fit the eyewitness descriptions and eels dont grow big enough unless we have an enuech eel which wud indeed be a new type of creature cus we have no proof of these yet. The tullimunstrem shows us that there are things that can look like nessie that have existed although the tulli is too small for nessie ... But were there are small things there are big things. Like the squid! Great to see new discoveries bin found and decent size ones too.... Strengthing the proof of more unknown aquatic creatures out there.... Cheers.. ROY

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, maybe Roy. If you're talking about Nessies being an evolved species of plesiosauria. The only problem I would see with that argument is they were reptiles and would not fare well in the frigid waters of Loch Ness. Although, I have read accounts of they maybe being warm blooded. Also, the one constant that stands the test of time in the majority of sightings is the plesiosaur archetype morphology. I think it was Tim Dinsdale who suggested that the LNM was a form of evolved plesiosaur. I tend to think not, but who knows. Never say never, as they say!

      Delete
  9. John alvarado I havnt said nessie is an evolved plesiosaur or that type!!! I'm favouring an unknown creature or a creature new to science or part of a family tree of a known creature. Did the tullimonster have a larger relative? Does the known eel grow into a eunuch eel? Are there large unknown fish in the ocean? Do amphibians that we don't know about exist?? I'm quite sure these Ness creatures are not known animals..eye witness accounts look nothing like sturgeon or catfish or seals.There is something unusual about these wonderful creatures .. ..cheeers . ROY

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. no matter what,nessie is NOT a plesiosaur!

      Delete
    2. No Roy, I didn't mean to imply YOU believed that, sorry. I really meant that "one" could possibly believe that.

      Delete
  10. New discoveries are still being made, like the whale mentioned above. Here's another one:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-6471887/The-largest-species-discovered-America-100-years-eel-spots-leopard.html

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great read Ken.. Cheers for sharing..lots of creatures yet to be discovered I thjnk!! Hmmm a salamander that looks eel like.. the plot thickens lol... Imagine having a bigger species of them say 15 feet long?? Wud fit some nessie sightings perfectly! Strengthens my case for the loch ness creatures to be summit new to science or a new found relative of summit known!...great to see... Cheers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haven't there been alleged sightings of eels in and around Loch Ness up to 30 feet? If that existed, think many sightings explained b y that creature, as long lived, just need a few of them!

      Delete
    2. There are tales of large thinner bodied serpentine creatures which are equated by some or many to eels.

      Delete