I caught this article on two alleged collisions between boats and the Loch Ness Monster. The first I did not recall and wonder if anyone knows any more about it? Original article here but reproduced here before it is pulled.
In the second incident, retired truck driver Stanley Roberts has
revealed that a holiday cruiser, he owned was immobilised in a tragic
collision on the loch near Urqhuart Castle. An elderly man aboard
the cruiser suffered a heart attack and died following the incident
around 1978, says Mr Roberts, from Lancashire who had rented the boat to
the man’s family. Four bolts were stripped from the propshaft
and the propeller was damaged after the boat was pulled from the water
at Fort Augustus.
Boatyard workers who then examined the cruiser
"found flesh and black skin an inch thick along the propshaft", said
Roberts, of St Helens, Lancashire, telling what had happened when he got
a phone call from the boatyard telling him there had been an accident. He
said, “The workers chiseled the flesh away and threw it into the
Caledonian Canal. I said you stupid b-----s. It would have proved that
Nessie was here.”
Stan, now 85, is in no doubt that the monster was most likely
involved in a drama involving his cruiser. A family renting it collided
with an unknown object near Urquhart Castle. "The propeller
stopped turning. The family were very alarmed", said Stan. "The old man
had a heart attack and seemed to have died. There was no radio on board
so they let off distress flares to get a tow back to Fort Augustus. The
grandfather was taken by ambulance to hospital where he was found to be
dead."
The rental managers phoned Stan at his home in St Helens
to tell him what had happened. "They simply told me there had been an
accident. It was only later that I learned more - what had been found on
the underside of the boat when they pulled it out of the water."
Told
of the boat drama, Adrian Shine, of the Loch Ness project, said it was
“very frustrating". With modern DNA techniques we could have learned a
lot about exactly what had caused the damage." Stan kept the cruiser on the loch for two years.
I, too, express frustration that none of this black flesh was recovered for further examination. Black skin suggests it was not seals or dolphins, but then again, I don't know whether blackness occurs during subsequent decomposition; but it cannot be discounted that the sceptics' oft required, but seldom seen seal could have been involved.
This seems a new story, but if anyone knows of this case, can they leave a comment. Mr. Roberts then tells of his own personal sighting.
His reason for being
convinced that Nessie was involved was partly an earlier encounter he
had himself. "I had just bought the boat and my family were up at
Fort Augustus for a two-week trial run. The water was rough but the boat
handled really well. That night I couldn't sleep so around 5am I got up
to stretch my legs.
"The water was dull silver, flat as a mirror.
I looked down the loch towards Foyers and I saw a black dot which I
thought might have been a local fisherman. The dot continued to grow
taller as it came towards where we were moored. "Then I thought
to myself, 'There's no outboard motor!" It was then I realised its head
and neck were like polished black leather.
"It gently lowered its
head - and not a splash. It was so beautiful, you wouldn't believe it.
It was like a nuclear sub going down. The bow wave travelling across the
loch, bounced my boat like a cork. My wife was awakened by the
commotion. And she told me off for rocking the boat.
The second incident is known to Loch Ness researchers and involves Lt Commander Francis Russell Flint in 1943. With the help of Henry Bauer, these details were forthcoming.
Details only emerged in 1969 when Lt Commander Francis Russell Flint wrote a letter to the Daily Telegraph. Flint said he was in charge of a Navy motor launch travelling from Leith to Swansea with about 20 men on board. Near
Fort Augustus travelling at about 25 knots, “There was the most
terrific jolt,” he said. Everybody was knocked back. And then we looked
for’ard. And there it was. A very large animal form disappeared in a
flurry of water. It was definitely a living creature not debris or
anything like that."
Flint, who died in 1977, talked about the
incident for years, said family members. He told author and broadcaster
Nicholas Witchell that he signalled the Admiralty, “Regret to inform
your Lordships, damage to starboard bow following collision with Loch
Ness Monster. Proceeding at reduced speed to Fort Augustus.”
Flint
said the Navy were not impressed with his signal. He got a “bit of a
blast” when he returned to base. However Flint was an official war
artist and painted a picture of the Loch Ness incident which went on
display at a gallery in Leeds. It is not known where the picture is
currently.
Sceptical cynics will suggest Flint made up the story to cover up his navigational inadequacies as he hit one of the local rocks. Funny how he kept talking about a monster into retirement ...
The author can be contacted at lochnesskelpie@gmail.com
Wow. That's quite a story from out of the blue. I'm amazed the Roberts story has gone this long without being written about. Checking out the heart attack story and the boat repairs will prove interesting, if possible. Can't wait to see how this unfolds.
ReplyDeleteAlso funny how none of the other 20 men are named as witmesses. A rock just under the surface is the obvious explanation.
ReplyDeleteOne would have thought that the Royal Navy would be familiar with the kind of damage a vessel incurs when hitting rocks and would have given an officer trying to cover up such a collision more than a “blast”. This suggests that whatever damage the ship suffered wasn't consistent with this explanation.
ReplyDeleteIt would be interesting to see the ship's log for the incident.
First time I've ever heard of a boat collision with a possible animate "something" in the loch. I don't blame Mr. Roberts for calling the workers “stupid b------s”. We could have had DNA proof a long time ago! Even Adrian Shine was pissed!
ReplyDeleteCould have been solved years before some of us were born.
DeleteNaughty Step for those workers!
Yeah! and Roy Mackal could of packed up his biopsy harpoons.
DeleteNow that definitely is one that's added to my knowledge.
DeleteBut just to remind you that the 1932 Hambro motorboat drowning (which IMO may have kicked the modern saga off) may also have involved a collision.
What it means: some "people" aren't stoopid -- they know how to get out of the way, but you just need to give them time.
*AnonStg*