Tuesday 24 August 2021

Hunting Nessie in Wigtown


I am not long back from the small town of Wigtown in the Scottish county of Dumfries and Galloway in the south west of Scotland. Back in 1998 it was designated the National Book Town of Scotland and no wonder as it hosts over a dozen well stocked second hand bookshops around its small green square shown above. Around 1998, I had visited that other book town, Hay-on-Wye on the English-Welsh border and came home with several boxes of books.

This time I was more circumspect and selective as my collection has dropped from thousands down to less then a thousand (I think having not actually counted them). I had some tightly defined subjects on my shopping list and the Loch Ness Monster was one of them. Admittedly, I own about 68 of the 70 titles ever published (excluding kids books and fiction), so I did not expect to fill the box this time.

So over the weekend, I toured the bookshops with these subjects in mind, but it proved to be a disappointing exercise and the results were as follows. Only about a third of the shops had any Nessie books and those were the shops with the biggest stocks. The first one visited produced the best selection as shown below. Those were "The Loch Ness Story" by Nicholas Witchell, "Nessie, Seven Years in Search of the Monster" by Frank Searle and "The Loch Ness Monster - The Evidence" by Steuart Campbell.



Witchell's book was the hardback first edition and was a snip at only five pounds, but I already owned it. As it turned out, I only bought Searle's book for one pound. Why buy that one by a proven faker? Well, actually, I was looking for such a copy, even though I also owned this, as I plan to write an article on Frank Searle and wanted to scan some text from his book. The trouble is scanning this book which is a thin glued spine could split it if forced flat onto a scanner bed. The solution is to buy another on the cheap and pull it apart!

Actually, for a man who claimed to have watched the loch more than anyone else, he does not have a lot to say compared to other monster hunters' books. It is a thin volume which was more likely written up quickly to cash in on the Nessie fever of the 1970s and probably also before the 1976 expose of Searle fully finished him off. How much of it is plagiarism is a matter of discussion. After that, it was onto the next book shop and that had two Nessie books in its Highlands section. One was a later paperback version of Witchell's book and the small tourist booklet produced by the Fort Augustus Abbey monks called "Loch Ness and its Monster", in this case, the 1967 reprint.



All the books so far were reasonably priced, probably cheaper than you will get on eBay and elsewhere. All the Nessie books were in the "Highlands" section and were in good condition. It was then onto the next bookshop which had the smallest stock of them all and their sole Nessie book was under the Folklore and Forteana section. It was the paperback version of Ronald Binns' first book from the 1980s. It was the most expensive book coming in at six pounds, I declined the offer and will say no more. It was then off to the bookshop which claimed to be the biggest secondhand bookshop in Scotland.



I had visited another large secondhand bookshop some months before, namely Leakey's of Inverness which is also a substantial bookshop. I compared the two in my mind's eye and thought that this one just shaded it for the title. Nevertheless, a search of the shelves revealed not one single title on the Loch Ness Monster in any form. Somewhat disappointed I enquired as to any titles out of sight. The response came up with the best one of all - "The Loch Ness Monster and Others" by Rupert T. Gould.



Unlike the picture above, the one he produced for me had no dustjacket and the listed price was a cool two hundred pounds. That is actually cheaper than some I have seen on eBay. The one I own cost about fifty pounds but that was purchased about twenty years ago. There was a reprint published in the 1970s which is a cheaper alternative for monster fans. However, this book had one particular claim to fame as it was owned by the author, Gavin Maxwell.

Maxwell authored the famous "Ring of Bright Water" but was also a fan of the Loch Ness Monster and indeed claimed a sighting of it back in 1945 as I recounted in this article. Indeed, his brother Eustace was directly involved in the hunt back in the 1960s. It then came to me later that Gavin Maxwell had actually been brought up in the area around Wigtown and some of his relatives still live in the Monreith area to this day. It would seem that some of them had sold off some of his collection to this book dealer. It would be natural to assume that having seen his monster in 1945, Maxwell bought the only available book on it at the time written by Gould.

I checked for anything unique, such as annotations by Maxwell and then handed back the book and that more or less ended the hunt. Five titles and nothing after the 1990s. Whether these titles are any less or more likely to be found than a random title with a similar publishing run is hard to say. I did not see anything published in recent years and I noted that there was not really anything else of a Fortean nature (e.g. UFOs or Bigfoot). 

I left with Searle's book plus a 1930s Ordnance Survey map of the loch and a couple of booklets on the Great Glen. It was an enjoyable weekend browsing all those titles and I would recommend a trip to the town for any lovers of long shelves of old books.


The author can be contacted at lochnesskelpie@gmail.com


15 comments:

  1. What are the two books still missing from your collection?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just two booklets from the 1930s. I have a photocopy of one of them. Never seen the other anywhere.

      Delete
  2. Were all Searle's photos deemed fakes? Here's one picture that seems to show a dark creature with two humps, a longish neck and an open mouth. I used to think it could be genuine until I heard about his forgeries. Now I'm critical, but it does seem to show a background of the loch so it's quite cleverly done if a hoax before photoshop times:

    https://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/heritage-and-retro/retro/fleetwood-mans-quest-to-unravel-legend-of-loch-ness-monster-3293020

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Something I've been wondering myself for a while. Were every single one of his photos fake? Before cgi it would seem it must have taken considerable effort to set up something like referred to above .
      Why did he go with the two humps as opposed to the more often reported one....like an upturned boat.
      Yes he had the time ,living beside the loch, to come up with hoaxes .
      But surely enough people living locally would have been well aware of him photographing tarpaulins over sticks/buoys etc.
      These things take a lot of effort and time to get the right ,convincing shot.
      Is there even the remote possibility that one or two of his photos were of an unknown creature?

      Delete
    2. You're not get many giving Frank the benefit of the doubt. It would require something beyond the given photo to cause a rethink.

      Delete
    3. Obviously, given his slew of hilariously bad fakes that followed, we are at liberty (and if we're gonna take the mystery seriously) to dismiss his entire body of work out of hand.

      In reference to the photo you mention with out with this damning baggage; there's no movement apparent. Looks like a serviceable model to me. As someone with experience of making similar models throughout his career - I don't think it would present much challenge, even to a layman. Time is the issue, of which I'm sure he had plenty. Then nip down early doors in the morning in a quiet part of the loch, snap a couple photos. Job's a good un.

      Delete
    4. Yes Kyle, I think also it's a model since it seems to cast a shadow on the water. Another method he used (mentioned on this blog I think) was just paste a cut-out of one picture on top of another. I guess he put a little more effort in this one!
      Well, I'm off to work and give Loch Ness a rest for now. Cheers!

      Delete
    5. You're totally right though - that image in particular is a "good" fake. If he'd left it at that it would probably still in consideration as evidence. It was his greed that undid him.

      Delete
    6. Yeah, if he hadn't brought attention to himself with the other obvious cut and paste jobs, his other crazy behavior and shenanigans that photo would probably be debated today as possibly genuine, rather than a fake. Poor sad sack Searle was his own worst enemy.

      Delete
    7. There looks to be a shadow line between the two humps giving the impression that they are not connected. This also makes them look out of alignment at the waterline.

      Delete
  3. Searle's book is still one of my favorites & he looks as though he had a bit of fun while up at the Loch !!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. lol, just having a jolly jape was he?

      Delete
    2. What would be the very best book so far written on Nessie then?

      Delete
  4. Nice article. Shopping for books is always a good experience.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm a bookshop fan so would be in my element up in Wigtown. It's especially fun when you go looking for Nessie books! I paid a visit to Leakey's when I was in Inverness in June. The only book on Loch Ness I found was the Binns paperback, as shown above. I was really on the hunt for More Than A Legend, but had to settle for Binns. Sorry, Roland! Oh well - it's one for the collection at least. :-)

    ReplyDelete