Tuesday, 23 February 2021

Books on Nessie and Sea Serpents

 


It has been a while since a Nessie book has been published. The last two were in 2019 and nothing in 2020, which was a bit of a surprise considering the extra time people had on their time during various coronavirus lockdowns. But Ken Gerhard was at work in 2020 researching his own Essential Guide to the Loch Ness Monster with a foreword by Steve Feltham. The promotional text on amazon.co.uk read thus:

For centuries, the Scottish Highlanders have told of great water beasts said to inhabit particular lochs and burns. The most famous of these is, of course, the Loch Ness Monster, or ‘Nessie,’ said to be twenty to forty feet long – far larger than any freshwater animal known to exist in the murky, fathomless lake. In this essential primer, world famous cryptozoologist Ken Gerhard presents the most accurate and indispensable information that’s been gathered with regard to the Loch Ness Monster – the best evidence supporting its existence, consensus expert opinions up to this point, the most compelling encounters, and really everything you need to know about the subject in order to become Nessie knowledgeable.

In addition, Gerhard discusses other celebrated aquatic cryptids, including Champ, Ogopogo, and so-called sea serpents. The reader will get answers to questions such as: Could they really exist? What do they look like? How many are there? Are they dangerous? Where are the remains? Finally, Ken makes an argument that these elusive creatures may be descended from a line of ancient whales, believed to have gone extinct millions of years ago. For centuries, the Scottish Highlanders have told of great water beasts said to inhabit particular lochs and burns. The most famous of these is, of course, the Loch Ness Monster, or ‘Nessie,’ said to be twenty to forty feet long – far larger than any freshwater animal known to exist in the murky, fathomless lake.

In this essential primer, world famous cryptozoologist Ken Gerhard presents the most accurate and indispensable information that’s been gathered with regard to the Loch Ness Monster – the best evidence supporting its existence, consensus expert opinions up to this point, the most compelling encounters, and really everything you need to know about the subject in order to become Nessie knowledgeable. In addition, Gerhard discusses other celebrated aquatic cryptids, including Champ, Ogopogo, and so-called sea serpents. The reader will get answers to questions such as: Could they really exist? What do they look like? How many are there? Are they dangerous? Where are the remains?

Finally, Ken makes an argument that these elusive creatures may be descended from a line of ancient whales, believed to have gone extinct millions of years ago. For centuries, the Scottish Highlanders have told of great water beasts said to inhabit particular lochs and burns. The most famous of these is, of course, the Loch Ness Monster, or ‘Nessie,’ said to be twenty to forty feet long – far larger than any freshwater animal known to exist in the murky, fathomless lake. In this essential primer, world famous cryptozoologist Ken Gerhard presents the most accurate and indispensable information that’s been gathered with regard to the Loch Ness Monster – the best evidence supporting its existence, consensus expert opinions up to this point, the most compelling encounters, and really everything you need to know about the subject in order to become Nessie knowledgeable.

In addition, Gerhard discusses other celebrated aquatic cryptids, including Champ, Ogopogo, and so-called sea serpents. The reader will get answers to questions such as: Could they really exist? What do they look like? How many are there? Are they dangerous? Where are the remains? Finally, Ken makes an argument that these elusive creatures may be descended from a line of ancient whales, believed to have gone extinct millions of years ago.

Now Ken is better known for his other cryptozoological adventures in North America and beyond, but he has turned his investigative eye to Scotland as well as some other lake cryptids. His theory that the monster may be a descendant of some ancient whales reminds me of Roy Mackal's zeuglodons, which he favoured at some point, so it does have some pedigree behind it. I am not inclined to that idea myself, but I will hear him out when I get a copy of the book. 

Looking at the preview on Amazon, the book actually extensively covers the whole range of sea and lake cryptids and so is not purely a book on the Loch Ness Monster, I would say just under 30% is devoted to my favourite cryptid. Ken did communicate with me by email asking questions which I was happy to answer and I know he is a believer in the beast, so he is off to a good start.

In the meantime, I note his arty cover bears a resemblance to this one from the 1970s. Both nice pieces of Nessie artwork and Ken's book is also on amazon.com.




A second book which has come to my attention is "Sun, Sand and Sea Serpents" by David Goudsward which focuses on the seas around Florida and the Caribbean. I hope to dip into that book at various points and its back cover text reads from amazon.com:



Ever since Columbus spotted mermaids, sea monsters, and mystery lizards in the New World, sightings of a diverse array of marine cryptids have continued unabated in the waters of Florida, the Southeastern coast, and the Caribbean. Dinosaurs, mermaids, and sea serpents in a range of colors and lengths, along with monster sharks, mystery seals, and giant penguins, all seem to have made the tourist-friendly waters of the region their home. In Florida, it became a running joke that the tourist season officially started when the first sea serpent report appeared in the newspapers.

What's behind all the reports? Hoaxes? Some certainly are. Yellow journalism? Yes, sometimes. Misidentifications? It's pretty common. A way to drum up business?  Shocking, but true. But in that mix, there are probably some unidentified animals as well. David Goudsward digs up the original sources and interviews to sort fact from fiction, and tells some fascinating stories along the way. 



Certain cases I will be reading up on are the famous Pensacola case of 1962 which alleged some fatalities. This case grabbed my attention as a youth back in the 1970s when I read it in Dinsdale's "The Leviathans", if I recall correctly. The case of the three toed monster also has my attention as I believe the Loch Ness Monster is three toed, although I suspect our American three toes has some deception involved.

So, plenty of reading ahead of me in the months ahead.



The author can be contacted at lochnesskelpie@gmail.com



36 comments:

  1. Ah, the extinct whales of Dr Mackal now coming back as who Nessie really is! Would make sense, as could be all of the so called lake monsters of northern zones could be such whales, as many sightings seem to indicate more mammal movements! At least this theory has real fossil evidence of once existed, unlike the long neck seal candidate!

    ReplyDelete
  2. A whale with a long neck? If being a long time follower of this mystery has taught me anything, is that everyone has their own idea of what the LNM could be. Having said that, don't buy that theory. It would be interesting to know how Mr. Gerhard came up with that conclusion. As I am not in the practice of buying books, after you read the book maybe you can do a critical review and let us know GB.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Would a small colony of whales survive in fresh water, and be able to stay hidden so well?

      Delete
  3. The Penescola case has surely been debunked by now? Fortean Times covered it a few months back, and I think put it to bed for once and for all. The "Three Toes" business has long been acknowledged as a hoax, it was given some credibility over the years by Ivan Sanderson's involvement in the investigation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, the book is even handed in discussing the good, the bad and the ugly.

      Delete
    2. What is that case, and was the 3 toes the so called Giant penguin hoax?

      Delete
  4. Has it been debunked?...first read it in The Leviathans many years ago...still one of the most blood chilling cases I think.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It scared me as a young lad as well. While some people certainly died in a tragic drowning incident, there is no evidence or testimony that points to a cryptid being involved. The story originated in Fate Magazine, which has been the origin of a few tall tales...

      Delete
    2. Wasn;t there a famous speedboat driver that died on Loch Ness trying to set the speed record, and some claimed he hit Nessie?

      Delete
  5. The Pensacola incident intrigued and piqued my interest. I may have read about it in "Leviathans" when I read the book years ago, I just don't remember it. With that in mind, I turned to the trusty Internet and found theses two articles. Certainly a creepy, convoluted tale fraught with high strangeness and doubt.

    http://www.creepypasta.org/pending/1962-pensacola-plesiosaur-attack

    https://www.chick.com/battle-cry/article?id=Author-Claims-Some-Dinosaurs-Live-Today

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you for the mention, Roland - and for your invaluable help in weeding through the more obscure information! It is true that Roy Mackal first endorsed the archaeocete theory - and it also should be noted that, while I consider it the most probable candidate for worldwide lake monsters and sea serpents, I remain open-minded. Also, I would emphasize the words "descended from," as such an animal would likely be an evolved form in the same family as the basilosaurs, but not necessarily the species we know of from its abundant fossil record.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nessie would have to be the same kind of creaturfe as all of the other various lake monsters one would think!

      Delete
    2. Thank you for the qualifying clarification Mr. Gerhard. I suppose some evolved decendant from an ancient whale could be the solution. It sure makes more sense than a giant turtle, eel, salamander, catfish, sturgeon, long-neck seal, or other conventional known animals.

      Delete
    3. Whatever it is, would seem to have to be the same as other lake monsters are, and do know that Champ had recorded noises that seemed to be some type of unknown whale or dolphin!

      Delete
    4. A well-reasoned argument from KG. "Evolved" is more likely than most other theories, as John A. points out above. I guess I'll have to read the book (no arm-twisting necessary) to find out how the question of the recent DNA testing fits into all this.

      Delete
    5. Do you see it as being only one type creature, or could there be more then one kind being seen over time?

      Delete
    6. Ken, thank you for your contribution to the Loch Ness literature! Looking forward to checking this out soon!

      Delete
  7. Just bought the Kindle edition for £4.32. My weekend reading is sorted!

    ReplyDelete
  8. The head and neck sightings cause problems for any whale though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe they evolved over time? Being though mammals, seems like would be seen a lot more on surface then they have been!

      Delete
    2. Would you believe a long-neck whale? LOL

      Delete
    3. Not as much as believing in a long neck seal!

      Delete
  9. Whales are also air breathers, so its a massive no no for me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So back then to big eels or big fish, eh?

      Delete
    2. No, back to what the hell is it?

      Delete
    3. "The Hunting of the Snark"
      By Lewis Carroll

      ...For the Snark's a peculiar creature, that won't
      Be caught in a commonplace way.
      Do all that you know, and try all that you don't:
      Not a chance must be wasted to-day!...

      ... They hunted till darkness came on, but they found
      Not a button, or feather, or mark,
      By which they could tell that they stood on the ground
      Where the Baker had met with the Snark.

      In the midst of the word he was trying to say,
      In the midst of his laughter and glee,
      He had softly and suddenly vanished away—
      For the Snark was a Boojum, you see.

      Delete
  10. Replies
    1. Do not need to breath air, can stay under water, and both known in the Loch!

      Delete
    2. What about amphibians or reptiles that have adapted to breathe underwater like some turtles?

      Delete
    3. There is place near me we call Turtle Road. It used to be part of a mule pulled barge system; now it is a long, straight canal witha rather wide strip of land that runs along it. The area is thick with turtles - mostly small ones, to be sure. You can see them sunning themselves as you walk down the path - get too far from the center, no matter how quiet, and they dive into the water at once. They stay under for a long time, and when they do surface to breathe just the very tip of the nose protudes above the water. Do I think Nessie is a long necked turtle? No. But these are traits that make amphibian reptiles possible...

      Delete
  11. Loch Morar Monster documentary: The Morag

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xxg1XW6lLaQ

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm with GEZZA. Any form of whale is a mammal / air breather so it can't really be that. You'd find it on day one.

    Really like the covers of both books though and good luck to the authors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Long neck seals could have nostrils near the top of their heads though!

      Delete
  13. Ken's book gets it first review on amazon.co.uk and it is one star. This is no surprise as it comes from a sceptic called "dystopia" who does the same to every pro-nessie book. Needless to say this person never buys or reads the books.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Until further evidence is produced I’ll keep standing my ground with firmly believing that Nessie is NOT a giant Eel, a Whale or even a long necked Seal. Eels by nature are bottom feeders and even though Eels can move on dry land at times it still doesn’t fit eyewitness reports in regards to land sightings. A whale? No. We’d see them frequently if that were the case. Giant long necked Seal? Same logic should be applied here, we’d also see them more frequently. Whatever is lurking within Loch Ness is still waiting to be discovered and I do believe it’s an unknown species.

    ReplyDelete