The leading
headline from this year past concerning our favourite monster came towards the end of the year as it was loudly proclaimed by the mainstream media that this was a record year for sightings in the 21st century with a total of nine claimed views of the monster. To quote the summary from Gary Campbell's sightings
website:
28th April - A Ms Cairney from Dunbartonshire was at the loch with
three of her friends when they saw a 20m long series of waves move at
about 5mph along the surface 500m out. It came out of nowhere and then
disappeared the same way - they have confirmed that there was no boat
traffic in the area. The sighting took place at 3pm from a layby on the
A82 road between Drumnadrochit and Inverness.
1st May - Ms Johnson from Manchester was at Urquhart Bay taking
pictures at dusk when she spotted a dark shape in the water, higher
than the waves.
12th June - Paula from Canada took a five minute video from the
Loch Ness webcam at 11.20am. It shows an unknown object moving slowly
down the middle of the loch towards Fort Augustus. This was similar to
the further recoding she took on 26th June, above.
22nd June - Mr Jackson and his wife, visiting from Australia snapped
something in the loch four miles south of Urquhart Castle at 5.18pm in
the afternoon. The sighting lasted about five minutes - this is what
they saw.
26th June - Paula from Canada took a video from the Loch Ness
Webcam at 7pm. It shows an unknown object moving slowly north on the
loch near Urquhart Castle.
22nd August - Mr Stuparich and three friends were out walking from
the Dores Inn to Tor Point. As they came to the shore on the point all
four saw something huge in the water. They said it was an unusual shape
- it arched out of the water then turned and went down underwater. The
sighting took place at 3.41pm and lasted about 10 seconds.
29th September - Diana Turner from the USA was watching the Nessie
on the Net webcam in the afternoon when she spotted a strange wake
movement on the water. The sighting lasted about two minutes and other
than the boat in the distance, she saw no other traffic on the loch. She
snapped a picture of the wake.
2nd October - Mrs Stewart from Oldham was on honeymoon when she
saw something moving in the water from the pier at Fort Augustus at 4pm.
The creature disappeared when a boat came out from the canal to the
loch. She managed to take a picture.
2nd November - Dr Knight and her son from the north of England
pictured what appears to be a fin or similar at 11.25 am from a cruise
boat on the loch. They didn't realise that they'd snapped anything until
they were going through their holiday pictures.
Now when you present a list of eyewitness testimonies to a diverse group of people, you are not going to get anything like unanimity on how many were actual sightings. The sceptics will reject all of them and the most gullible believer will take them all. The more thoughtful advocates of the creatures will take the middle road.
You will note of these nine accounts, three were by people a long way from the loch using the Nessie on the Net webcam. This is a popular feature allowing many to indulge in a bit of armchair Nessie hunting. They have produced some interesting images over the years which this blog has covered. The problem is the camera is also a long way from the loch meaning anything of Nessie proportions will be no more than a blob on the screen.
The sighting by Hayley Johnson on the 1st May has been covered
here too with some debate as to what she had photographed. In her own words:
I had stayed in a backpackers’ hotel and on my last night decided to go
for a walk through the woods and ended up on the banks of the loch. It
was lovely and at dusk. Then about half a mile away I saw this dark shape sticking up – like a
neck. I thought at first it was a tree, but it was very strange. I took a
picture. It was there for a couple of seconds, but when I looked back
it was gone. I was shocked.
It was claimed she had simply photographed one of the various logs that are washed into the bay from the rivers. One such log was proposed which I photographed on my visit to the loch the following month. I rejected that theory as the log looked nothing like the object in the picture, but I also did something that sceptics never do - I listened to what the witness said about the object. That is, she said the object disappeared and logs don't do that.
What may be of more interest was this picture taken a week later of an evident Nessie model floating in the same area. But was this curious object even there a week before when Ms. Johnson walked along the bay and did it have any connection? I will come back to this item later, but the jury is out on Hayley's photo for me personally.
To that sightings list I could add the interesting experience of a local Foyers man on the 5th February which I covered
here, though this only involved a water disturbance. Nothing was seen except a strange effusion of bubbles breaking the surface as it went in the direction of some jumping fish.
The picture taken by Rebecca Stewart on the 2nd October generated further interest as it had the look of a dorsal finned creature. It gained some traction, but in my own
investigation of the picture, I contacted Marcus Atkinson of Cruise Loch Ness whose boats pass that way and the solution was soon at hand as a log, this time very appropriately shaped, had been taken by one of the crew. Problem solved.
Another curious picture was then one taken by Peter Jackson on the 22nd June shows another curiously shaped object making its way up the centre of the loch, some four miles south of Urquhart Castle. I wrote up on this at this
article.
Retired engineer Mr
Jackson, 64, and former lawyer Ms Weare, 60, said they were stunned by
what was only the second claimed sighting of the monster this year. Ms Wearne said: 'I really was just stunned
and I thought, "what is it?" It was pretty big even from 150 yards or
more offshore. I didn't know what to think.
We
took photos and showed them to people at a B&B and (then) on a
cruise. Skipper for the Loch Ness Project, Ali Matheson, said he had not
seen anything like it. It seemed to be moving fast but in the
direction of the current. We just figured if he's worked on here for
years and not seen anything like it, then it must be something.
Theories about swimmers and boats were dismissed, though the ubiquitous tree debris reared its ugly head again. The object looks static over the two pictures shown above and so one must tend to an inanimate interpretation, but the sceptical vigilantes who were quick to post pictures of logs after Hayley Johnson's story, were notable by their absence for this one. No one seems to have produced a natural picture of this object.
What was rather worrying was that the object was estimated to be 150 yards offshore and yet we have a poor quality image. Yet another epic fail on the much vaunted smartphone front, proving there is no substitute for quality, professional, telephoto zoom photography - unless the monster is close enough to see the whites of your fear laden eyes; and who is going to hang around for that photo-op? One thing seems certain for 2018, and that is a supply of interesting and usually inconclusive images to evoke further discussion and debate.
But there was one instance where images obtained looked of a decent quality as a video
emerged in early May of an apparent long necked creature swanning past a cruiser boat. It all looked good until that model Nessie picture shown above turned up and seemed to be in the line of travel of our static necked "Nessie". Further
investigation led to the conclusion that another Nessie documentary was in the offing.
But in the pursuit of science at Loch Ness,
news came in April of a New Zealand professor's attempt to find evidence of trace DNA of the monster, or eDNA as it is called. Professor Neil Gemmell had been to the loch, consulted a few people and headed back to Otago with the intent of crowd funding a major eDNA analysis of Loch Ness which promised to offer a complete DNA profile of the loch's residents.
Things turned decidedly shaky though when it turned out he needed £100,000 to pursue his research and since then it has all gone a bit quiet (though admittedly it always goes quiet during the winter months). Meanwhile, it seems another scientist has been quietly gathering water samples from Loch Morar for his own eDNA experiments. Perhaps 2018 will bring news of Mhorag rather than Nessie on this front.
The year 2016 had been a good year for Nessie books with four being published. However, 2017 seemed to only have one Nessie dedicated book and that of questionable quality, being the latest
offering from arch-sceptic, Ronald Binns. Yes, I confess I had to pay for a copy back in August, but I still have not got round to reading it as it constantly slips down the priority queue. I will attempt to right that once my own second book on the Loch Ness Monster comes out in late January 2018.
Having said that, 2017 was somewhat counter balanced by Andrew McGrath's "
Beasts of Britain" whose cryptozoological overview of the UK did contain a chapter on the Loch Ness Monster.
In terms of visits to the loch, I was at the loch in
June and
September. What is still uncertain to me was the huge splash that I saw in mid loch off Foyers on the first day there in September. Was it the Loch Ness Monster? There is no way of knowing, and it remains inconclusive to this day. The usual experiments and watches were conducted with no game changing results. Unlike webcams that sweep across square miles, the narrowly focused trap cameras I have in place will hopefully yield more accurate results, albeit more exceedingly rare and devoid of blobs!
What will 2018 produce in terms of experiments? The tech market now offers mini-ROVs, thermal cameras and HD ready drones. Which one would you employ first in your search of the loch? Here's to an cryptozoologically rewarding 2018 and I wish readers a prosperous and fulfilling year ahead.
The author can be contacted at lochnesskelpie@gmail.com
