In the 1970s, long before the Internet, there were mainly four ways of finding information on a subject. Three of these were books, magazines and newspapers. The fourth was newsletters. The problem was simple enough, once a book was published it was immediately out of date. New information would be published at irregular intervals in magazines and newspapers but the problem was finding out when and where such items were put on the newsstand. Some got round this by subscribing to newspaper clipping services but others subscribed to newsletters.
The newsletter was a popular publication back then and still is now being a tried and tested concept. An individual qualified in a certain subject would collate and analyse information for a group of like minded individuals. The newsletter would be sent by post usually monthly or quarterly to keep the subscriber base up to date on what was happening in the chosen field.
So it was no surprise that in the 1970s the popular subject of the Loch Ness Monster also had its share of newsletters. Well, I actually only know of two such newsletters. The first was by Frank Searle and if anyone can send me paper/scanned copies that would be appreciated. The second and best however was written and published by Rip Hepple.
Rip had been visiting the loch since the early 1960s and was a member of the Loch Ness Phenomenon Investigation Bureau throughout that time. When that group disbanded, he had established a network of contacts which stood him in good stead to start a newsletter in 1974 which he appropriately called the "Nessletter".
Encouraged by such people as Tim Dinsdale (who also proofread draft copies), the first issue came out on February 1974 under the umbrella of his "Ness Information Service". As of today, it has now reached issue number 158 and continues to be published at irregular intervals.
The advantages were obvious. Subscribers would be kept up to date on sightings, personalities, expeditions, Nessie theories and other lake cryptids. Rip's network of colleagues and subscribers would also inform him of items that could be disseminated to the whole group.
There was also the social networking element as subscribers advertised their forthcoming trips to Loch Ness and later reported back their experiences. Finally, anything relevant to the Loch in a broader sense would also make its way to print.
With that rich seam of information in mind, I phoned Rip and suggested the idea of a digital archive for his past newsletters. To my great pleasure, he was agreeable to the idea and has kindly given his consent for a number of issues to be digitised and made available to other Loch Ness Monster enthusiasts.
The process of digitisation is simple enough (albeit time consuming). The paper copy is scanned to a JPEG file, it is then uploaded to Google Documents in a structured way and then the Internet link to each issue is created and published here below.
The work is ongoing as I think only half of what Rip has consented to be digitised was in my hands. Also, an index needs to be added to guide readers to specific topics. Nevertheless, what is currently available adds up to over 200 pages in 53 issues (I think the content easily exceeds that of my own blog).
In some ways, the Nessletter is THE most important document available on Loch Ness and its Monster for its chronicles a phenomenon, its abode, followers and critics in a continuous manner for nearly 40 years now. Quite simply, a unique publication such as this should not be allowed to disappear from view. If you want a full perspective on the phenomenon that is the Loch Ness Monster, then Nessletter is a requirement.
The current archive extends from 1975 to 1985 with the aim of stopping at 1994. To subscribe to the latest issues, send a letter to Rip at the following address.
Subscription rates are: £3 (UK) or $10 (USA)
R.R.Hepple
7 Huntshieldford
St John's Chapel
Weardale
Co Durham
DL13 1RQ
United Kingdom
7 Huntshieldford
St John's Chapel
Weardale
Co Durham
DL13 1RQ
United Kingdom
Note that the newsletters remain under Rip's copyright. Enjoy the archive, let me know of any issues and I will post updates as and when they are added. Also note that since Google moved to Google Drive that you are likely to be greeted by a thumbnail of the JPEG and not a readable image. In that case, right click on the image and select "View Image" which should give you what you want.
No.2 March 1974 (Added 5th May 2012) - link
No.3 May 1974 (Added 5th May 2012) - link
No.4 July 1974 (Added 5th May 2012) - link
No.5 October 1974 (Added 5th May 2012) - link
No.6 December 1974 (Added 5th May 2012) - link
No.7 February 1975 (Added 5th May 2012) - link
No.8 April 1975 - link
No.9 June 1975 - link
No.10 August 1975 - link
No.11 October 1975 - link
No.12 December 1975 (Added 5th May 2012) - link
No.14 February 1976 (Added 5th May 2012) - link
No.15 April 1976 - link
No.17 August 1976 (Added 5th May 2012) - link
No.18 October 1976 - link
No.19 December 1976 - link
No.21 April 1977 (Added 5th May 2012) - link
No.22 June 1977 - link
No.23 August 1977 - link
No.24 November 1977 (Added 5th May 2012) - link
No.25 December 1977 - link
No.26 February 1978 - link
No.27 April 1978 - link
No.28 June 1978 - link
No.29 August 1978 - link
No.30 October 1978 - link
No.31 December 1978 - link
No.32 February 1979 - link
No.33 April 1979 - link
No.34 June 1979 - link
No.35 August 1979 - link
No.36 October 1979 - link
No.37 December 1979 - link
No.38 February 1980 - link
No.39 April 1980 - link
No.40 June 1980 - link
No.41 August 1980 - link
No.42 October 1980 - link
No.43 December 1980 - link
No.44 February 1981 - link
No.45 April 1981 - link
No.46 June 1981 - link
No.47 August 1981 - link
No.48 October 1981 - link
No.49 December 1981 - link
No.50 February 1982 - link
No.51 April 1982 - link
No.52 June 1982 - link
No.53 August 1982 - link
No.54 October 1982 - link
No.55 December 1982 - link
No.56 February 1983 - link
No.57 April 1983 - link
No.58 June 1983 - link
No.59 August 1983 - link
No.60 October 1983 - link
No.61 December 1983 - link
No.62 February 1984 - link
No.63 April 1984 - link
No.64 June 1984 - link
No.65 August 1984 - link
No.66 October 1984 (Added 5th May 2012) - link
No.67 December 1984 - link
No.68 February 1985 - link
No.70 June 1985 - link
No.71 August 1985 - link
No.72 October 1985 - link
No.73 December 1985 - link
No.74 February 1986 - link
No.75 April 1986 - link
No.76 June 1986 - link
No.77 August 1986 - link
No.78 October 1986 - link
No.79 December 1986 - link
No.80 February 1987 - link
No.81 April 1987 - link
No.82 July 1987 - link
No.83 August 1987 - link
No.84 October 1987 - link
No.85 December 1987 - link
No.86 February 1988 - link
No.87 April 1988 - link
No.88 June 1988 - link
No.89 August 1988 - link
No.90 October 1988 - link
No.91 December 1988 - link
No.92 February 1989 - link
No.93 April 1989 - link
No.94 June 1989 - link
No.95 August 1989 - link
No.96 February 1990 - link
No.97 April 1990 - link
No.98 July 1990 - link
No.99 August 1990 - link
No.100 November 1990 - link
No.101 March 1991 - link
No.102 June 1991 - link
No.103 August 1991 - link
No.104 October 1991 - link
No.105 December 1991 - link
No.106 January 1992 - link
No.107 March 1992 - link
No.108 May 1992 - link
No.109 July 1992 - link
No.110 September 1992 - link
No.111 January 1993 - link
No.112 March 1993 - link
No.113 June 1993 - link
No.114 August 1993 - link
No.115 November 1993 - link
No.116 January 1994 - link
No.117 April 1994 - link
No.118 - TBD
No.119 October 1994 - link
No.120 January 1995 - link
Great idea, you're right about the importance of the archive. Its amazing when yuo think how technology has changed over the decades its been published through. I didn't even know it was stll on the go.
ReplyDeleteCheers
Les
Awesome! Simply awesome! Thank you so much to both Rip and yourself for making this available! What a treasure-trove!
ReplyDeleteWhat an excellent resource - thanks so much to all involved.
ReplyDeleteEh - when I try to click these links, I come to a commercial for Google Drive, and I can find no way of getting from there to the newsletters (I've even tried copying the linkadress into the adress line, but to no avail). Am I doing something wrong, or is Google responsible? (I do have a Google account, so that shouldn't be the reason).
ReplyDeleteHmmm, I know that Google are going to move Google Docs to Google Drive, sounds like a commercial but one would normally expect a "cick here to continue" button. I just tried it on Explorer 8 with no problem. Anyone else got an issue?
DeleteMaybe it's because I use Firefox? Anyway, I've just tried it again - same problem and no way of getting onwards except (possibly) by signing up for Google Drive, which I don't want to do.
DeleteIt's fantastic to have these 'real time' events unfold before me. A fascinating historical record, and many thanks to you and Rip Hepple for these efforts.
ReplyDeleteIs the first one missing a page? Nessletter #2 makes references to things that I don't see in #1...
ReplyDeleteMay be, let me check mu original paper copies.
ReplyDelete