An interesting image from Loch Ness was published by the Sun newspaper today purporting to show the Loch Ness Monster in its single hump aspect taken by a Dipak Ram from Manchester last week. The account runs as follows:
Dipak Ram, an NHS consultant from Manchester, took the image that shows a
large dark “mass” in the waves of the legendary loch last week. The 33-year-old spotted the dark shadow in the water near Dores beach at 5.35pm. The medic at first believed it was a strange wave pattern but insists
that when he zoomed in with his camera he found a “stationary object”. Dipak, who says the sighting was witnessed by a fellow tourist,
claims that this was “Nessie’s hump or neck” and says it disappeared
below the surface after 30-35 seconds.
Speaking today, the NHS doctor who works across Greater Manchester,
said: “We have had a breathtaking experience of spotting Nessie and were
very lucky indeed.“We noticed a dark shadow in the water which we initially thought was
just a wave but the shadow remained persistent for about 30-35 seconds
with water moving around it. “It was cloudy without any rain but the waves were reasonably calm
and we took the picture from the rocky aspect of Dores beach.”
“When I zoomed in using my camera phone, it became much more apparent
that the stationary object was indeed Nessie’s hump/long neck. “After 30-35 seconds, the shadow disappeared downwards into the water. Unfortunately, we didn’t film it as we were in shock.” Dipak named the witness as Tom Smith, a “fellow traveller” from
Ramsbottom, Greater Manchester, but says he does not have contact
details for him.
Now if you read Mr. Ram's account, he is convinced it was no wave as it remained stationary in the midst of the water movement around it. Of course, this cannot be established from one image and it is clear he regrets not putting his camera into video mode. I would accept his testimony in the absence of contrary testimony (e..g how corroborative would Mr. Smith's account be?), but more critical assessors will ignore his words and make a judgement based purely on the merits of the image. I would point out the "hump" is more water blue that monster black or gray, but that may be my imagination.
Not only would a video have been useful to establish its independence from the waves, but also to record the submergence moment to further verify its independent existence from the water. Another useful image would have been a pan out to the Dores Bay shoreline to give an idea of how far in or out the image was (not a log in the shallows). Information is everything and the more we have, the more confident the conclusions and the less chance of fob offs. So we have one image, perhaps there are others, but there is not enough to go on with here unless anyone has any other observations or information.
The author can be contacted at lochnesskelpie@gmail.com
