As I was reviewing some old e-clippings I had acquired over the previous months, I noted one that revived an ongoing conundrum for me. Has one or more of the Loch Ness Monster individuals sported a dorsal fin at varying points over these past eight decades. The clipping in question was taken from the Dundee Evening Telegraph dated the 19th July 1938. This is a sighting that was not on my database, so I presume it is one that has gone under the radar of the general Nessie literature.
It is not a high grade sighting by any means and one wonders what these two men saw that day. I would suggest that their sighting was "of short duration" due to the fact that they were driving and saw the object in a gap between trees. The alternative is that they had stopped to survey the waters and had seen it shortly before it submerged. The fact that it was described as "some distance out" does not help either. Low duration and high distance do not make for classic sightings,
Be that as it may, this reminds me of last year's dorsal fin photograph which evoked much controversy as the sceptics tried to interpret it as an osprey. To me it is a dorsal fin and the best proof that something with such an appendage is at various times to be found in the loch.
And then there is the famous Adams/Lee fin photograph which clearly shows a dorsal fin and the only argument is where it was taken. Attempts to find the uncropped picture have failed, but there are good reasons to think it was taken at Fort Augustus.
We have had such experts as Jeremy Wade suggesting a finned Greenland Shark as a visitor to the loch and there is the older controversy over whether dolphins or porpoises were in the loch in September 1914. Are these real cetacean visitors to the loch, distinct from any mysterious monster or are they one and the same? If we accept that something as water dependent as a dolphin can get into Loch Ness, the case for something else getting in which is more amphibious strengthens.
Anyway, this is also a bit of a preamble before an overdue article on whether Nessie is a visitor to Loch Ness rather than a resident.
The author can be contacted at lochnesskelpie@gmail.com
Anyway, this is also a bit of a preamble before an overdue article on whether Nessie is a visitor to Loch Ness rather than a resident.
The author can be contacted at lochnesskelpie@gmail.com
Although shallow the River Ness is close to the sea where sightings of a Nessie like creature have been reported off the eastern coast of Scotland.
ReplyDeleteCould a large animal enter/exit Loch Ness undetected at night when heavy rains have raised the water level?
When was the last time the River Ness flooded?
I think large animals could slip by unnoticed given the right conditions.
Yes
DeleteI remember we had some rough storms over a year ago.
Yes
I have noticed in my study of the subject that sometimes there is no sightings for months then 2 sightings on the same day at different times, or even a sighting followed by another the next day. This would go with a creature that has come up from the sea, stayed a while then gone back to sea. There again, there could be another reason for this of course.
ReplyDeleteThere is also the Popular Mechanics magazine at the time of the Surgeon's Photo claiming that it was also a dorsal fin (tip 'flopped' over as it were). I would believe that explanation more than lock necked animal or the hoax theories to be honest.
ReplyDeleteOne for you:
Deletehttp://lochnessmystery.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/strange-sight-in-loch-duich.html
Might it also be possible (not the river Ness as most people presume Nessie enters the loch) but enters the loch from the west coast and enters the loch from Fort Augustus?
ReplyDeleteAlthough I'm not familiar with the depth of water of river Lochy and river Oich the rivers do seem to run through less populated areas, maybe Nessie enters loch Ness so......
Open sea > loch Oich > river Lochy > loch Lochy > loch Oich > river Oich > Fort Augustus.