tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post7887818824565224559..comments2024-03-20T18:13:07.791-07:00Comments on LOCH NESS MONSTER: Follow Up to the William Jobes PhotoGlasgow Boyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-65726769711698323342016-07-05T16:18:40.244-07:002016-07-05T16:18:40.244-07:00Some of the lenses have stabilisation, not the cam...Some of the lenses have stabilisation, not the camera bodies. Even recently, I owned an unstabilised long lens, which was about half the price of the stabilised version.Martin Curranhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09590190801760284564noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-75574897624687635082016-07-05T16:15:57.777-07:002016-07-05T16:15:57.777-07:00Cost of camera is a factor here, and even HD video...Cost of camera is a factor here, and even HD video is a mere 2mp, so not very enlargeable at all. If a 40d was what he could afford, then it was. And if he couldn't afford to buy a newer camera with video capabilities, then he couldn't. I'm not sure of your argument here.Martin Curranhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09590190801760284564noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-2817185423507987442012-03-21T02:32:54.641-07:002012-03-21T02:32:54.641-07:00It is a pity that Mr Jobes has not published all h...It is a pity that Mr Jobes has not published all his frames as that makes you ask why. In 2007 Mr Linden Adams photographed something on Windermere with a very similar camera - a Canon EOS 30D - and has very helpfully made all his material available to researchers by placing it on various websites and blogs like <br />http://lindenadamsphotography.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/bownessie-lake-windermeres-new-species.html<br /><br />Regarding the shaking, those Canon models have image stabilisation so no excuse there.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-18060514735492166392012-03-20T17:38:46.885-07:002012-03-20T17:38:46.885-07:00The image looks like something straight out of Fra...The image looks like something straight out of Frank Searles scrapbook. Very dubious. Im with Rip. Log or flotsam at best. A series or sequence of images really helps support all recorded sighting...sadly missing again. Nice blog though !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-71757559368882436692012-03-13T06:53:38.360-07:002012-03-13T06:53:38.360-07:00I don't think Jobes faked anything but video i...I don't think Jobes faked anything but video is better (assuming one can stop shaking in which case it is worse!)<br /><br />I would also like to see any other photos.Glasgow Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-57048377509398406132012-03-13T06:31:29.423-07:002012-03-13T06:31:29.423-07:00After 40 years Mr Jobes is still using a still cam...After 40 years Mr Jobes is still using a still camera to record Nessie? Looks like an EOS 40D or similar, but even they take 3 frames per second, so where are the rest of the photos? Another person who preferred taking stills photos to shooting movies was Frank Searle and we all know his reason.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com