tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post6616677357308393913..comments2024-03-20T18:13:07.791-07:00Comments on LOCH NESS MONSTER: The Mysterious "Footprints" of Loch NessGlasgow Boyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comBlogger28125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-88851238255454159422018-08-14T12:18:00.087-07:002018-08-14T12:18:00.087-07:00Arthur C Clarke made mention of becoming almost fu...Arthur C Clarke made mention of becoming almost fully sceptical as an older man, despite his previous fascination with mysteries, and his famous TV shows. That said, some of those shows still contain mysteries which have not been solved, and as I see it, call into question how we view the world we live in.<br /><br />As for the regular repeating pattern, I don't think that there's any way it could be natural in origin. If you consider Nessie a part of the natural world, that would include her. Explosives testing maybe? Or explosives dumping. A lot of explosives.....Martin Curranhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09590190801760284564noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-54290146164103422412014-06-23T02:58:07.988-07:002014-06-23T02:58:07.988-07:00Believers turned sceptic ? Yes indeed. But we also...Believers turned sceptic ? Yes indeed. But we also have sceptics turned believers!!! And i know that through conversations ive had up there over the years!Jakenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-71918638722533051242014-06-16T13:14:30.801-07:002014-06-16T13:14:30.801-07:00That was just the one footprint they investigated,...That was just the one footprint they investigated, they implied they were to do with military activity at the Loch during the 2nd World war.<br /><br />MalcAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-63718710803331246252014-06-16T10:24:50.841-07:002014-06-16T10:24:50.841-07:00A line of wheelbarrows?
A line of wheelbarrows?<br />Glasgow Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-53679286290654246172014-06-16T09:38:42.764-07:002014-06-16T09:38:42.764-07:00The footprints were featured in the Discovery chan...The footprints were featured in the Discovery channel documentary 'Loch Ness discovered', they sent a ROV down to one of them and it was a wheelbarrow, they didnt investigate anymore.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-12756263585915517012014-06-11T17:19:27.441-07:002014-06-11T17:19:27.441-07:00What on earth does that mean, anonstg?What on earth does that mean, anonstg?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-52069617055722856402014-06-11T12:05:40.449-07:002014-06-11T12:05:40.449-07:00But why all these incoming tinfoilers and sceptics...But why all these incoming tinfoilers and sceptics [in the sense of climate change den...sceptics]?<br />Are we in the stage of "Tut,tut" or "Ha,ha"?<br /><br />*AnonStg* [MA (Hons) i.e. properly educated :) ]Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-67338051207217513432014-06-11T06:15:21.593-07:002014-06-11T06:15:21.593-07:00I can guess at the effort, but not all turned scep...I can guess at the effort, but not all turned sceptic.<br />Roy Mackal springs to mind.<br /><br /><br />Glasgow Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-77054746307743004862014-06-11T06:00:49.486-07:002014-06-11T06:00:49.486-07:00Probably not, no. If you knew exactly how much fru...Probably not, no. If you knew exactly how much fruitless effort took place back in those days you'd know where I'm coming from. One by one we saw believers turn sceptical as the years went by.<br /><br />There was one very famous hunter who had turned about 99% sceptical by the late 1980's but he'd invested so much time and effort by that point he was too embarrassed to admit it. I know this from our conversations but I will not divulge his name.<br /><br />It really is a fruitless search at the lovely loch. Whenever I return now I am much relieved at being able to view the loch for what it is, a dramatic stretch of water. I no longer have an eye scanning my peripheral vision for non existent monsters. It's a far more beautiful place to me now.<br /><br />A.R.C. BSc (Hons)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-70221719664230959202014-06-11T01:55:49.334-07:002014-06-11T01:55:49.334-07:00Oh well, I guess we won't be hearing much more...Oh well, I guess we won't be hearing much more from you then!<br />Glasgow Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-21429153301365683022014-06-11T01:44:19.566-07:002014-06-11T01:44:19.566-07:00Just found this page. I lived lochside from 1971 ...Just found this page. I lived lochside from 1971 (from age 20) to 1990. I'm shocked people haven't quit the search yet.<br /><br />I saw it all in the 1970's and 1980's and by the time the 1990's arrived we all knew the monster was simply a myth which caused false sightings. <br /><br />You are all free to do what you want with your lives, but believe me, you will NEVER find a monster in that loch.<br /><br />A.R.C. BSc (Hons)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-26603104215388659882014-06-10T14:55:28.273-07:002014-06-10T14:55:28.273-07:00Well, that Wellington Bomber was not silted over a...Well, that Wellington Bomber was not silted over after 40 years, but I would not expect it plus it was in shallower waters?<br /><br />I reckon it would take about 63,000 years for Loch Ness to completely silt up. But who knows, perhaps the next glacial period would have arrived to bury it in ice again!<br />Glasgow Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-38351251269249143232014-06-10T11:52:25.188-07:002014-06-10T11:52:25.188-07:00Don't know. Guess best bet would be something...Don't know. Guess best bet would be something to do with WWII operations. Can't imagine yearly silt layers can be very much since even WWII or else the loch would've been completely filled by now, no?<br />So if those objects have any height, they'd still be partially uncovered and sonar reflect.<br /><br />JonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-91969383590504078752014-06-10T09:16:24.096-07:002014-06-10T09:16:24.096-07:00Back to these Loch Ness "footprints", pl...Back to these Loch Ness "footprints", please.<br />Glasgow Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-82765609066906021612014-06-10T09:15:36.885-07:002014-06-10T09:15:36.885-07:00Yes, back to these footprints, please.
Yes, back to these footprints, please.<br />Glasgow Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-82390903805752356122014-06-10T09:14:58.778-07:002014-06-10T09:14:58.778-07:00I would not imagine pre-glacial structures. It'...I would not imagine pre-glacial structures. It's a pity Rines' ROV did not get down there to inspect one of them, or did it?<br />Glasgow Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-43317734926229820082014-06-10T09:07:34.815-07:002014-06-10T09:07:34.815-07:00GB, you should ask Bacofoil if they're interes...GB, you should ask Bacofoil if they're interested in sponsoring your site.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-49306430156089933912014-06-10T07:45:49.075-07:002014-06-10T07:45:49.075-07:00Here is a quote from another of Meier's report...Here is a quote from another of Meier's reports, http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_251<br /><br />"On a broader scale, expect a coup involving the USA and its president, in the year 2003, in march, which will stun the entire world."<br /><br />Wow! How did I and everyone else fail to notice that one?<br /><br />Elsewhere he flatly states that the Apollo 11 flight was a hoax. Sorry, it wasn't. Meier has no credibility at all.David Evanshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13590531184544289491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-85464978013164724162014-06-10T07:30:34.163-07:002014-06-10T07:30:34.163-07:00Jee whizz Bruce - and you claim the other report w...Jee whizz Bruce - and you claim the other report was "too far fetched (and) ridiculous"!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-38647991605057011832014-06-10T07:04:50.906-07:002014-06-10T07:04:50.906-07:00@Bruce. The LNM couldn't have survived undistu...@Bruce. The LNM couldn't have survived undisturbed in the loch for 'millions upon millions' of years as the loch 'only' came to be 10,000 years ago as a result of the last ice age. :-)<br /><br />JonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-12821029146585516442014-06-10T04:17:04.473-07:002014-06-10T04:17:04.473-07:00I think these anomolies could be hatches leading t...I think these anomolies could be hatches leading to each family of nessies cavernous homes. When word gets out that someone is sweeping the loch with sonar, all the nessies dart for their homes and slam the hatches shut.<br /><br />This would explain the total lack of sonar hits during Rines work and the BBCs work in recent years.Derek "Sweet D" McIntoshnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-16602372115412300732014-06-09T15:28:56.007-07:002014-06-09T15:28:56.007-07:00yes, Billy Meier the contactee
that was from a 1...yes, Billy Meier the contactee <br /><br />that was from a 1989 contact report ... don't know if there have been updates since ... but I did find it interesting and logical that the alleged creatures would be Plesiosaurs, particularly from the descriptions and murky photos in circulation, not to mention that it was the parents with one offspring ... that really would be something if they could have survived undisturbed in that particular Loch all these millions upon millions of years .<br /><br />I find that other story not only too far-fetched but ridiculous, even as I find the Meier report possible.Brucehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12578947287312584266noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-11957923131927718752014-06-09T13:55:32.181-07:002014-06-09T13:55:32.181-07:00Well, the only thing I agree with is the infrequen...Well, the only thing I agree with is the infrequent sorties to the surface. Billy Meier was a contactee I presume? That has little to do with the Loch Ness Monster for me.<br /><br />Here is another take on ETs and Nessies:<br /><br />http://lochnessmystery.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/the-extraterrestrial-loch-ness-monster.htmlGlasgow Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-6829017854431462772014-06-09T13:19:55.094-07:002014-06-09T13:19:55.094-07:00If one is open enough to allow for the possibility...If one is open enough to allow for the possibility of the so-called Loch Ness creature, then one can allow for this source as well <br /><br />http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_230<br /><br />Billy <br />We spoke once about the Ness Sea, therefore Loch Ness in Scotland, in connection with so-called Nessie, whereby it is supposed to deal with a saurian, for which, however, up until now, no proof of existence could be brought forth. <br />But you have said that such an animal does actually exist in Loch Ness and that all that, therefore, it is not about a fairy tale. <br />I would like to see the beast. <br />Can you take me to it sometime? <br /><br /><br />Quetzal <br />109. Actually, two parent animals and a young do exist. <br />110. It thereby deals with an aquatic predatory saurian, therefore about Plesiosaurus which have sustained themselves for many generations. <br />111. However, proving their existence will be very difficult, because the animals themselves only seldom make their way into the higher waters, or even to the waters' surface in such a way that they can be sighted. <br />112. We have observed these distant saurian descendents for many years and have, during the course of our research, also found petrified fossils of their distant predecessors, which we left where we found them where they will perhaps be found some day by terrestrial palaeontologists or other Earth humans. .<br />113. Naturally I will take you there so you can see the animals, however you must not make that public for the next 12 years. <br /><br /><br /><br />Brucehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12578947287312584266noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-52115011962337259142014-06-08T22:12:19.327-07:002014-06-08T22:12:19.327-07:00I've read about these pillars before. Interest...I've read about these pillars before. Interesting stuff. Some sort of legacy from glaciation was one of my thoughts too, or perhaps the legacy of some volcanic activity given the fault line in the Great Glen.<br /><br />Would definitely be worth studying though.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com