tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post5498484236011085464..comments2024-03-20T18:13:07.791-07:00Comments on LOCH NESS MONSTER: The Skeptic Theory of NessieGlasgow Boyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-38975531592718668372019-04-25T01:49:22.164-07:002019-04-25T01:49:22.164-07:00My understanding is the paper has to do with 19th ...My understanding is the paper has to do with 19th century sea serpent reports and contemporary fossil finds and nothign to do with 20th century nessie reports.<br />Glasgow Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-14250508134377812492019-04-24T18:08:54.871-07:002019-04-24T18:08:54.871-07:00https://www.foxnews.com/science/loch-ness-monster-...https://www.foxnews.com/science/loch-ness-monster-mystery-solved<br />Have you seen this yet?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-86084768176225309132013-09-01T11:21:46.310-07:002013-09-01T11:21:46.310-07:00A marine Biologist did speculate there was more th...A marine Biologist did speculate there was more than one and it/they came from the north sea,swim around the loch, surface occasionally then return via an underground river. Its reckoned there is not sufficient food in the loch to sustain a creature this size. Could it be a Plesiosaur ? In the nineteen thirties,a Coelacanth was discovered off east Africa,thought by scientists to be long extinct,perhaps Nessie is in a similar category.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13591281162215652539noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-15148737773486712772012-08-10T08:30:15.492-07:002012-08-10T08:30:15.492-07:00Wow thats a big article and very informative.
I&#...Wow thats a big article and very informative. <br />I've always thought there were 2 types of witnesses..<br /><br />1. Honest, but unsure what they were seeing. Could be an animal, but it could be a wave, or a log or a shadow cast by a cloud. Either way, they're seeing something unusual, and their faith determines how they interpret it. They're not idiots. We all see things, and for a moment are not sure what they are. If they saw some of these things on a place which -was't- loch ness, maybe they'd dismiss it. Either way, the romance of a mysterious monster on a famous lake adds some pizazz to what might be a ripple now doesn't it?<br /><br />2. Deceivers. These people make hoax photographs or stories to further themselves in some way. They're not honest, but they know they have an audience (commercial or otherwise) in the believers - or even the open minded but unsure. There's money - or at least momentary fame - to be made everywhere. ;-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-25749094569424921752012-07-14T07:07:32.033-07:002012-07-14T07:07:32.033-07:00With Rines photographs of 1975,included the secret...With Rines photographs of 1975,included the secret one that I have,there´s no evidence that the Cadborosaurus of Loch Ness existed.You´re skeptics,because you don´t believe in yourselves.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-52923839613849821452012-05-30T19:23:50.987-07:002012-05-30T19:23:50.987-07:00Awesome article! You have done a wonderful job at ...Awesome article! You have done a wonderful job at explaining why people like you and me are actually skeptics. Those closed-minded debunkers are not skeptics. They are, indeed, the true believers!Troodon Roarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06458650924508744077noreply@blogger.com