tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post7421052296946423177..comments2024-03-20T18:13:07.791-07:00Comments on LOCH NESS MONSTER: The Latest Nessie VideoGlasgow Boyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comBlogger156125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-1998194214908738962015-04-05T13:02:38.385-07:002015-04-05T13:02:38.385-07:00No John im just stating that the video looks like ...No John im just stating that the video looks like a large creature.Timnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-79237668600700854722015-04-05T07:12:28.489-07:002015-04-05T07:12:28.489-07:00Any large animal could leave such a disturbance Ti...Any large animal could leave such a disturbance Tim. You're not suggesting Nessie is a hippo, I hope! ;-)John Alvaradohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18069155979480353745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-83228663096210863132015-04-05T01:49:18.877-07:002015-04-05T01:49:18.877-07:00I have just watched a video of a hippo in the wate...I have just watched a video of a hippo in the water going up and down. When it submerges it looks exactly like this video. Just a thought :-) TimTimnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-61791828091034573232015-04-03T21:54:28.467-07:002015-04-03T21:54:28.467-07:00Hello Anonymous. Are you Mr. Bigglesworth? And if ...Hello Anonymous. Are you Mr. Bigglesworth? And if so, are you speaking in the 3rd person? Or are you responding on behalf Mr. Bigglesworth? Or lastly, is Mr. Bigglesworth your nom de guerre? Hey!are you Mr. Bigglesworth the cat? I loved you in Austin Powers! Just wondering.John Alvaradohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18069155979480353745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-21498778090430655192015-04-03T10:48:27.346-07:002015-04-03T10:48:27.346-07:00Yes , what was the biggest lizard again before the...Yes , what was the biggest lizard again before the komodo dragon was gound Mr Caruthers ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-86742059207678987152015-04-03T09:29:16.188-07:002015-04-03T09:29:16.188-07:00Bravo Guam.A well analyzed response to the sponser...Bravo Guam.A well analyzed response to the sponsered cutout " kelvin". WhoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-1152629913870532322015-04-03T09:15:08.485-07:002015-04-03T09:15:08.485-07:00Mr. Bigglesworth responds;Its amazing how Mr. Caru...Mr. Bigglesworth responds;Its amazing how Mr. Caruthers has done an inventory of all the salamanders of the world,known and unknown.truly monumental.Well done sir!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-66627990737153967592015-04-02T08:17:29.887-07:002015-04-02T08:17:29.887-07:00Maybe he has in mind Steve Plambeck's giant sa...Maybe he has in mind Steve Plambeck's giant salamander?John Alvaradohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18069155979480353745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-76074947099183867672015-04-02T06:17:29.455-07:002015-04-02T06:17:29.455-07:00Mr. Bigglesworth, the largest amphibian in existen...Mr. Bigglesworth, the largest amphibian in existence is the Chinese giant salamander, weighing in at a maximum of 110 pounds and 5'9" long. What's the basis for your six-ton amphibian? Burton Caruthersnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-56448904253738013842015-03-30T23:58:15.126-07:002015-03-30T23:58:15.126-07:00Kelvin,What kind of a standing wave would a 6 ton ...Kelvin,What kind of a standing wave would a 6 ton amphian,just submerging,under the water,make?<br />Mr. BigglesworthAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-68672149997578186552015-03-27T08:26:56.012-07:002015-03-27T08:26:56.012-07:00On their way.On their way.Kelvinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-50379499730372448782015-03-26T13:53:41.346-07:002015-03-26T13:53:41.346-07:00Ah mixed up lol sumone did. Thats nights for ya. f...Ah mixed up lol sumone did. Thats nights for ya. fort augustus lovely place. Had some good nights there :)jakenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-15616231712588171312015-03-26T12:52:51.736-07:002015-03-26T12:52:51.736-07:00I live in Dores, 200 metres from the pub. I grew u...I live in Dores, 200 metres from the pub. I grew up in Fort Augustus though.<br /><br />I never mentioned a database! ha.trevorthecatnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-29257380234501714012015-03-25T09:56:09.296-07:002015-03-25T09:56:09.296-07:00Well ive got friends in the area who have seen thi...Well ive got friends in the area who have seen things and i know are not lying. Not loads but a few! You say its only important if its in the database but thats your choice not mine. Doesnt bother me if its in the database to be honest. i reaserch the mystery in my own little way with a bit of fun ( some are too serious) all i see in the database is old hat and bales of hay and toy submarines thsts bin discussed a million times! I prefer to listen to quiet people who dont seek attention to be honest, too many george edwards about lol. But each to their own i think trevor! All im doing is personally trying to find out if there is truth in large creatures in loch ness! One thing that keeps me going is people telling me they see things and people who have lived by the loch and not fooled by boat wakes etc! If they dont report it that is their buisness. I was shown a photo bout 5 year ago from a lad who was a non believer. I wish he wud of shown it to Steve Feltham cus i thought it was a good one ( and i disregard 90% of photos).but his photo...his choice!! Anyway ...the truth is out there :))jakenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-57526538171885667782015-03-25T09:44:22.591-07:002015-03-25T09:44:22.591-07:00Ok, have your big Loch Ness Momster, Guam. You cle...Ok, have your big Loch Ness Momster, Guam. You clearly won't be parted from it.Kelvinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-47188690941187555552015-03-25T09:27:53.839-07:002015-03-25T09:27:53.839-07:00wer by the loch do u live trevor?wer by the loch do u live trevor?jakenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-40513403658348589102015-03-25T08:32:23.087-07:002015-03-25T08:32:23.087-07:00"Indeed, if there were an animal in Loch Ness..."Indeed, if there were an animal in Loch Ness with a penchant for imitating standing waves, then that would be a strong contender."<br /><br />I asked this before: If "something underwater" (e.g., an animal) had emerged at that point, would it have caused a significantly different effect in the water than a "standing wave"? How? You are the expert. Enlighten us. Speak. Show us. I hoped to hear how a competent assessment of the movement of the water in this video would rule out an emerging animal, or at least show it to be very unlikely, and all I heard instead is question-begging talk of probabilities that anybody without any degree in waves is capable of typing.<br /><br />"Likewise if there were a poltergeist able to conjure up the same effect, that too would be a strong contender."<br /><br />Well, many of us have seen animals emerging from water, and it seems to me that this sort of effect can well be conjured up in that way, which is more than wave scientists can say, apparently, which does not speak well of the state of education in wave science. I have not seen poltergeists in action in water, so I can't tell. However, if a poltergeist is responsible for doing this, or if a seclusive unknown animal is, by your methodology you will never find out the truth.<br /><br />"However, neither an unknown animal, nor a poltergeist are likely to exist, therefore the wave is *obviously* a much more likely candidate."<br /><br />That's begging the question. What is likely depends on what is the case. But what is the case is precisely the question being asked. How likely is it that a royal flush comes up from a deck of cards? Well, if the deck is stacked, it's not only quite likely, but may be unavoidable.<br /><br />Your scientific expertise has no role in what you are saying, and it gives no additional traction to your argument. And yet you come here and wave (heh!) the expertise around so as to elicit special attention to your comments. But that's an attention you have not deserved by anything you have written here, which makes me realize that this comment is already way longer than it needs to be.<br /><br />- Guam<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-51646645601282123372015-03-25T03:23:56.188-07:002015-03-25T03:23:56.188-07:00"I'm working on the videos. It's prov..."I'm working on the videos. It's proving trickier to convert them than I expected. And I'm also wondering whether it's worth doing it anyway. The people who frequent this site seem mostly hell-bent on viewing every water bulge and every swirl in Loch Ness as evidence for a monster. There's a feeling that no amount of evidence to the contrary could ever alter that."<br /><br />Just show us the videos, thanks.<br />Glasgow Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-63761689465962809942015-03-25T02:17:20.702-07:002015-03-25T02:17:20.702-07:00Thanks, now when you point us to the aforementione...Thanks, now when you point us to the aforementioned videos demonstrating your hypothesis, we'll form a judgement.<br /><br />Glasgow Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03597014995112568086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-65834341555628587532015-03-25T01:00:33.506-07:002015-03-25T01:00:33.506-07:00Its a monster.you can see somthing black in the wa...Its a monster.you can see somthing black in the water.as for champ,well 5, FIVE,cinco people saw the snake like head ,big hump,and heard a high pitched noise before the animal submerged.it was 30 feet at least.<br />Several researchers have recorded echilocation @ 144,000 hz,in 3 different locations,of 16 foot to 35 foot in size biological.<br />Liz muggenthaller of fauna communications,for discovery channel.dennis hall and katy elizibeth,and audio interviews on rense WITH liz muggenthaller.sorry but your " standing wave" has no leg to ,ahem..stand on.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-47609548184626936232015-03-25T00:45:52.841-07:002015-03-25T00:45:52.841-07:00Sounds like Geordie complaining.Kelvin please post...Sounds like Geordie complaining.Kelvin please post your " standing wave" visual proof instead of expending energy on the lost comments conspiracy..:0)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-58118633096442867412015-03-25T00:36:55.476-07:002015-03-25T00:36:55.476-07:00Natural, real lakes were used as well as the lab.
...Natural, real lakes were used as well as the lab.<br /><br />I'm working on the videos. It's proving trickier to convert them than I expected. And I'm also wondering whether it's worth doing it anyway. The people who frequent this site seem mostly hell-bent on viewing every water bulge and every swirl in Loch Ness as evidence for a monster. There's a feeling that no amount of evidence to the contrary could ever alter that.Kelvinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-81554231704643463382015-03-24T22:28:54.584-07:002015-03-24T22:28:54.584-07:00Well Tim, i've lived at the side of the loch l...Well Tim, i've lived at the side of the loch long enough to hold a different view.<br /><br />I've never bought into this oft-trotted-out claim that there are loads of local sightings going unreported, simply because i've never heard anything to support that, and i live here and so do a lot of my friends, family and acquaintances.<br /><br />The only local sightings im aware of are either the ones that have gone mainstream - John Rowe, Richard Collis, Marcus Atkinson to name 3 of the more recent ones - or tricks of the loch that people recognise as such and are able to explain away.<br /><br />However, and here's where my 'initiating the coversation' thing comes in for those who seems to have misunderstood, i accept it's something that needs to be brought up in conversation in order for an unreported sighting to be revealed. Unless you are known as an enthusiast of the subject or you bring the subject up, i can't see a circumstance where an unreported sighting is going to enter the conversation. <br /><br />That's why i'd be interested in Steve's view - he is a known enthusiast, so perhaps people will be more inclined to share with him. Maybe he can offer a different perspective than mine.<br /><br />trevorthecatnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-55878396961194675402015-03-24T17:04:02.052-07:002015-03-24T17:04:02.052-07:00Not to me anon. Im interested in what they saw. a...Not to me anon. Im interested in what they saw. and thats all that matteers to me !jakenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-358999656752738469.post-13783854601466914652015-03-24T16:08:01.966-07:002015-03-24T16:08:01.966-07:00A non reported sighting is a non entity. Just does...A non reported sighting is a non entity. Just doesn't enter any equation or data set. Believers saying there are loads of unreported sightings is about as insignificant as skeptics saying they're sure all of the people who say they've seen a monster have probably confessed to their nearest and dearest that they lied. Point I'm making is it's all pure speculation. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com